Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180262, 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1019969

ABSTRACT

Abstract The incorporation of antimicrobials in the composites as an attempt to reduce bacterial adhesion without jeopardizing mechanical properties is a challenge for Dentistry. Objective: To evaluate the bacterial adhesion and physical properties of a composite containing the methacrylate triclosan- derivative monomer (TM). Methodology: TM was synthesized and added to an experimental composite. Samples were divided into two groups: Control and TM (13.4 wt%). Antibacterial Activity: Three specimens of each material were prepared and placed on bacterial suspensions of Streptococcus mutans for 1, 5 and 10 days. After these periods the counting of the colonies (log10) was performed. Assays was performed in triplicate. Physical Properties: Three-body Abrasion (TBA): Ten specimens of each material were prepared and stored at 37°C/24 h. The surface roughness (Ra) and hardness (KHN) were analyzed. Next, the specimens were submitted to abrasive wear (30,000 cycles) and re-evaluated for Ra and KHN; Sorption/solubility (SS): cylindrical specimens (n=10) were prepared and weighted. The specimens were immersed in deionized water for 7 days at 37°C and then their weight was verified again. SS were calculated using accepted formulas; Diametral tensile strength (DTS): specimens (n=10) underwent test performed in an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to appropriate statistical tests according to data distribution and assay (p<0.05). Results: Bacterial Adhesion: TM showed a significant reduction on biofilm accumulation in the evaluated periods: 1 day (1.537±0.146); 5 days (2.183±0.138) and 10 days (4.469±0.155) when compared with Control: 1 day (4.954±0.249); 5 days (5.498±0.257) and 10 days (6.306±0.287). Physical Properties: For TBA, SS and DTS no significant difference was found between groups Control and TM. The incorporation of methacrylate triclosan-based monomer in the experimental composite reduce bacterial adhesion of S. mutans and did not affect important polymer properties.


Subject(s)
Triclosan/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Methacrylates/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Reference Values , Solubility , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Toothbrushing , Triclosan/pharmacology , Bacterial Adhesion/drug effects , Materials Testing , Colony Count, Microbial , Reproducibility of Results , Composite Resins/pharmacology , Hardness Tests , Methacrylates/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
2.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 32: e008, 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889493

ABSTRACT

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the in situ degree of conversion, contact angle, and immediate and long-term bond strengths of a commercial primer and an experimental adhesive containing indomethacin- and triclosan-loaded nanocapsules (NCs). The indomethacin- and triclosan-loaded NCs, which promote anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects through controlled release, were incorporated into the primer at a concentration of 2% and in the adhesive at concentrations of 1, 2, 5, and 10%. The in situ degree of conversion (DC, n=3) was evaluated by micro-Raman spectroscopy. The contact angle of the primer and adhesive on the dentin surface (n = 3) was determined by an optical tensiometer. For the microtensile bond strength µTBS test (12 teeth per group), stick-shaped specimens were tested under tensile stress immediately after preparation and after storage in water for 1 year. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests with α=0.05. The use of the NC-loaded adhesive resulted in a higher in situ degree of conversion. The DC values varied from 75.07 ± 8.83% to 96.18 ± 0.87%. The use of NCs in only the adhesive up to a concentration of 5% had no influence on the bond strength. The contact angle of the primer remained the same with and without NCs. The use of both the primer and adhesive with NCs (for all concentrations) resulted in a higher contact angle of the adhesive. The longitudinal μTBS was inversely proportional to the concentration of NCs in the adhesive system, exhibiting decreasing values for the groups with primer containing NCs and adhesives with increasing concentrations of NCs. Adhesives containing up to 5% of nanocapsules and primer with no NCs maintained the in situ degree of conversion, contact angle, and immediate and long-term bond strengths. Therefore, the NC-loaded adhesive can be an alternative method for combining the bond performance and therapeutic effects. The use of an adhesive with up to 5% nanocapsules containing indomethacin and triclosan and a primer with no nanocapsules maintained the long-term bond performance.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Dental Bonding/methods , Indomethacin/chemistry , Nanocapsules/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Triclosan/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration Failure , Dentin/drug effects , Materials Testing , Phase Transition/drug effects , Polymerization/drug effects , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrum Analysis, Raman , Surface Properties/drug effects , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
3.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e30, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952070

ABSTRACT

Abstract Oral rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants is a way to restore esthetics and masticatory function in edentulous patients, but bacterial colonization around the implants may lead to mucositis or peri-implantitis and consequent implant loss. Peri-implantitis is the main complication of oral rehabilitation with dental implants and, therefore, it is necessary to take into account the potential effects of antiseptics such as chlorhexidine (CHX), chloramine T (CHT), triclosan (TRI), and essential oils (EO) on bacterial adhesion and on biofilm formation. To assess the action of these substances, we used the microcosm technique, in which the oral environment and periodontal conditions are simulated in vitro on titanium discs with different surface treatments (smooth surface - SS, acid-etched smooth surface - AESS, sand-blasted surface - SBS, and sand-blasted and acid-etched surface - SBAES). Roughness measurements yielded the following results: SS: 0.47 µm, AESS: 0.43 µm, SB: 0.79 µm, and SBAES: 0.72 µm. There was statistical difference only between SBS and AESS. There was no statistical difference among antiseptic treatments. However, EO and CHT showed lower bacterial counts compared with the saline solution treatment (control group). Thus, the current gold standard (CHX) did not outperform CHT and EO, which were efficient in reducing the biofilm biomass compared with saline solution.


Subject(s)
Humans , Titanium/chemistry , Bacterial Adhesion/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Saliva/microbiology , Surface Properties/drug effects , Time Factors , Tosyl Compounds/pharmacology , Tosyl Compounds/chemistry , Triclosan/pharmacology , Triclosan/chemistry , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Oils, Volatile/chemistry , Chloramines/pharmacology , Chloramines/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Biofilms/growth & development , Bacterial Load , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/chemistry , Mouthwashes/chemistry
4.
Braz. dent. j ; 25(2): 153-159, Mar-Apr/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-719215

ABSTRACT

Dentifrices with different compositions are available on the market, but there is limited information about their properties. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics of 12 dentifrices divided into three categories, as containing desensitizing agents, Triclosan or whitening agents. Desiccation loss/residue analysis: 5 g of dentifrice was weighed five times for each group. pH analysis: 5 g of dentifrice were diluted in three parts of distilled water and analyzed using a digital potentiometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): analysis of ashes, shape and size of the particles. Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX): identification of the abrasive elements. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test (α=0.05). Desiccation loss: 38.21% to 65.83%. Dentifrices containing Triclosan and desensitizing agents showed statistically significant differences among them (p<0.05). Whitening dentifrices showed statistically significant differences between Close-Up Whitening and Sensodyne Branqueador (44.72%, 65.83%, respectively). Most dentifrices presented neutral or basic pH. Different shape and size particles were observed in the SEM analysis. Abrasive elements were identified in the EDX. These results demonstrate that the evaluated dentifrices had different properties and their composition influences directly their characteristics, thus resulting in a more or less abrasive action on tooth surface. Knowing the characteristics of the dentifrices is important to indicate the ideal product for each case.


Dentifrícios com diferentes composições estão disponíveis no mercado, mas existe pouca informação sobre suas propriedades. O objetivo do presente estudo “in vitro” foi avaliar as características físico-químicas de 12 dentifrícios divididos em 3 categorias, como contendo: agentes dessensibilizantes, triclosan ou agentes clareadores. Perda por dessecação/análise de resíduos: 5 g do dentifrício foi pesado cinco vezes para cada grupo. Análise do pH: foram diluídos 5 g do dentifrício suspensos em três partes de água destilada e analisados usando um potenciômetro digital. Microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV): análise das cinzas, forma e tamanho de partículas dos agentes abrasivos. Espectroscopia de raios X por dispersão em energia (EDX): identificação dos elementos abrasivos. Análise dos dados: Os dados foram analisados usando ANOVA e teste pos-hoc Bonferroni (α=0,05). Perda por dessecação: 38,21% à 65,83%. Os dentifrícios contendo triclosan e agentes dessensibilizantes mostraram diferença significante entre eles (p<0,05). Dentifrícios clareadores mostraram diferença significante entre Close-Up Whitening e Sensodyne Branqueador (44,72% e 65,83%, respectivamente). A maioria dos dentifrícios apresentaram pH básico ou neutro. Diferentes formas e tamanhos das partículas foram observadas na análise em MEV. Elementos abrasivos foram identificados no EDX. Estes resultados demonstram que os dentifrícios avaliados apresentaram diferentes propriedades e que suas composições influenciam diretamente em características, resultando em ações mais ou menos abrasivas sobre a superfície do dente. O conhecimento sobre as características dos dentifrícios é importante para indicar o produto ideal para cada caso.


Subject(s)
Dentifrices , Tooth Bleaching Agents/chemistry , Triclosan/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission
5.
Braz. oral res ; 24(1): 28-33, Jan.-Mar. 2010. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-541509

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes considering that most of the previously proposed methods are expensive and cannot be easily implemented. Two-hundred toothbrushes with standardized dimensions and bristles were included in the study. The toothbrushes were divided into 20 experimental groups (n = 10), according to microorganism considered and chemical agent used. The toothbrushes were contaminated in vitro by standardized suspensions of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans. The following disinfectants were tested: 0.12 percent chlorhexidine digluconate, 50 percent white vinegar, a triclosan-containing dentifrice solution, and a perborate-based tablet solution. The disinfection method was immersion in the disinfectant for 10 min. After the disinfection procedure, the number of remaining microbial cells was evaluated. The values of cfu/toothbrush of each group of microorganism after disinfection were compared by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn's test for multiple comparisons (5 percent). The chlorhexidine digluconate solution was the most effective disinfectant. The triclosan-based dentifrice solution promoted a significant reduction of all microorganisms' counts in relation to the control group. As to the disinfection with 50 percent vinegar, a significant reduction was observed for all the microorganisms, except for C. albicans. The sodium perborate solution was the less effective against the tested microorganisms. Solutions based on triclosan-containing dentifrice may be considered effective, nontoxic, cost-effective, and an easily applicable alternative for the disinfection of toothbrushes. The vinegar solution reduced the presence of S. aureus, S. mutans and S. pyogenes on toothbrushes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Disinfection/methods , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Acetic Acid/chemistry , Borates/chemistry , Colony Count, Microbial , Candida albicans/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Dental Disinfectants , Dentifrices/chemistry , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus/drug effects , Time Factors , Triclosan/chemistry
8.
Rev. paul. odontol ; 21(6): 16-24, nov.-dez. 1999.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-256100

ABSTRACT

Sabido é, que a melhor forma para o controle da placa bacteriana dentária säo os recursos mecânicos, exercidos por meio de escovas e fios ou fitas dentárias. Considerando-se as dificuldades para se conquistar uma escovaçäo ideal, tem que se recorrer mais ansiosamente para os estudos realizados sobre agentes químicos, disponíveis no mercado brasileiro, capazes de ser bons coadjuvantes nas manobras de higienizaçäo bucal domiciliar. Esta é a razäo de se apresentar através deste trabalho algumas consideraçöes sobre os benefícios da utilizaçäo de anti-séptico bucal com base em um composto clorato do fenol, o triclosan, associado ao copolímero gantrez (metoxietileno e ácido maléico) e ao flúor


Subject(s)
Oral Hygiene , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Motivation , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Triclosan/chemistry , Fluorine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL